dahliamorie SG was it difficult? i found the essay easy. source base was do-able. i did venice! i whack all my memory on venice this two days.
hatemeifuwantto SG fcuk..i wrote got element of sarcasm.. i studied every single thing in sec3 de..then come out all sec 4 de.wtf. lucky i did the singapore birth rate thingy one before.
Scania N113CRB luver SG Damn for essay , non of those i've studied came out ! The paper was relatively easy , for SBQ only. SEQ quite a killer for Question 2b .
lpx88 SG No kick la only my conclusion very uncertain And lost about 3-4 marks in 1 of my SBQ qns..coz no time.. Oh well...some of my friends weren't that fortunate...they had to leave out 1 whole 7 mark SBQ qn
lpx88 SG I wrote double meaning, but in this case, sarcastic to show the negative side of it Mostly due to the fact that this source is taken from a march, an event staged by Indians who opposed the tests, to express their unhappiness.
ghast. SG fruck la. seq my school predict freaking damned tamade not zhun can. walao. and source e is not sarcastic although lot of teachers say so. also, “no problem” from the source doesnt mean sarcasm. sarcasm needs stronger tone and words. besides. source e doesn’t prove tat indians support the nuclear tests.
Dead_Man_Inc SG i studied venice only, cause i fall asleep while studying sustaining development. then merger i just read and flip through, never really go read in the end i choose venice
wonderamazement SG *sigh... I didn't really study for this la... You just broke up recently right, can cope not?
